Field Points versus Probability Pi-Shells in Pi-Space

So far in GR, we have Field Points and in QM we have Probability Pi-Shells.

These are two representations of the same things.

The Probability Pi-Shell, like the Field points form the fabric of Space Time.  Therefore they are both smaller than the Planck Length.

In GR we model them getting smaller as one moves toward the center of gravity.

In GR in terms of measurement, we represent the Field Points altering the size of the Classic Pi-Shell which is typically modeled as an atom.

The Metric is the area size to the atom in terms of an area change relative to an observer.

Proper Time is the diameter change relative to an observer.

So GR mainly focuses on how relatively large “local” Pi-Shells move through the Field Points which form Space Time.

Next we deal with Probability Pi-Shells which deals with how the Field Points themselves change size.  This is different from GR where we measure the changes to the Classic Pi-Shells moving through Field Point Space Time.

Here we need to work out the changes to the sizes of the Field Points themselves.

As I’ve shown already, we cannot measure them using current technology so we use a predictive mechanism using probabilities.  As I’ve already shown, the higher the probability, the smaller the Field Point can become.

Just like in GR, any quantum particle moving through this Field Point Space Time, will follow the path of Least time which means it moves towards the Field Points which are the smallest.

The field points also oscillate which means that they change size due to their interaction with wave functions which are modeled in QM.

Note that in GR, one does not need to model the size change of the field points, all one must do is model the change to the area of the moving Pi-Shell or the change to its area as it moves within this field.  This therefore maps to the Potential.  This is outlined in the Classic Gravity sections.  Also, like QM, the Geodesic is the Path of Least Time for a Classic Pi-Shell so the two approaches are the same.